• Free Download Bashan 200cc Service Manual Programs For Low Income Housing
• Free Download Bashan 200cc Service Manual Programs For Low Income Homeowners
• Free Download Bashan 200cc Service Manual Programs For Low Income People

Jan 13, 2016. Hence, low values of matric potential in soil result in thin and disconnected aqueous films and thus hinder microbial rates of motion and dispersal. Area of a 'rough' (a) or 'smooth' (b) ceramic PSM surface at matric potentials of 0 kPa and –2 kPa, obtained by laser scanning microscopy (bar is 200 μm). Low Income Weatherization; Solar. Service providers, energy. Review our Commercial and Residential provider programs for more information and find out if you. Bashan 200cc Service Manual. In fact, it Bc-3000 Service Manual beyond just backing up. Free download and software reviews. Get Free Download Ebook and Manual Reference. Ebook and Manual Reference. Sony Kdl 26u2000 Kdl 32u2000 Kdl 40 U2000 Tv Service Manual Low Carb Casseroles 25 Tasty Casseroles Recipes That Are Surprisingly Low Carb Low Carbohydrate High Protein Low Carbohydrate Foods Low Carb Low Carb Cookbook Low Carb Recipes.

This service manual describes the service procedures for the Yamaha Blaster YSF200 (YSF-200). Follow the Maintenance Schedule recommendations to ensure that the ATV is in peak operating condition and the emission levels are within the standards set by the your states/county Resources Board. Performing the scheduled maintenance is very important. It compensates for the initial wear that occurs during the life of the YSF-200 Blaster.All chapters in this YSF200 Blaster service manual apply to the whole vehicle and this service repair manual illustrates procedures for removal & installation of components that are in detailed step-by-step fashion.Most Yamaha Blaster service manual chapters start with an assembly or system illustration, diagrams, exploded parts view, quality pictures, service information and troubleshooting for the section. The subsequent pages give detailed procedures.

If you don’t know the source of the trouble, go to the troubleshooting page for a list of causes and effects to determine the problem.Service Manual, Repair Manual, Owner's Manual, Blaster Manual, YSF200 Manual, 200, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 2006 2007 2008, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 00, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06 07 08 ATV Shop Manual, Workshop Manual, Yamaha YSF Service Manuals pdf, Factory Repair Guide User's Guide, Guide Book, Handbook, Book, Instructions Manual, Download Manual. Related Yamaha Searches:ENGINEStarter Motor Does Not Operate or Does Not Turn Engine Over1. Ignition switch not in ON position.2. Engine run switch in OFF position.3.

Discharged battery, loose or corroded connections (solenoid chatters).4. Starter control circuit, relay, or solenoid faulty.5. Electric starter shaft pinion gear not engaging or overrunning clutch slipping.6.

Bank Angle Sensor tripped and ignition switch not cycled OFF then ON.Engine Turns Over But Does Not Start1. Fuel tank empty or fuel supply valve turned off.2. Fouled spark plugs.3.

Engine flooded with gasoline as a result of over use of enrichener.4. Vacuum hose to automatic fuel supply valve disconnected, leaking, or pinched.5.

Discharged battery, loose or broken battery terminal connections.6. Engine lubricant too heavy (winter operation).7. Spark plug cables in bad condition and shorting, cable connections loose or cables connected to incorrect cylinders.8. Loose wire connection at coil, battery, ECM connector or ignition control module connector.9. Ignition timing incorrect due to faulty coil, ECM, ignition control module or sensors.Starts Hard1.

Spark plugs in bad condition or have improper gap or are partially fouled.2. Spark plug cables in bad condition.3. Battery nearly discharged.4.

Loose wire connection at one of the battery terminals, coil, ECM connector or ignition control module connector.5. Carburetor controls not adjusted correctly.6.

Water or dirt in fuel system and carburetor.7. Intake air leak.8. Fuel tank vent hose and vapor valve plugged, or carburetor fuel line closed off, restricting fuel flow.9. Enrichener valve inoperative.10.

Engine lubricant too heavy (winter operation).11. Ignition not functioning properly (possible sensor failure).12. Faulty ignition coil.13.

Valves sticking.Starts But Runs Irregularly or Misses1. Spark plugs in bad condition or partially fouled.2. Spark plug cables in bad condition and leaking.3.

Spark plug gap too close or too wide.4. Faulty ignition coil, module, or sensor.5.

Battery nearly discharged.6. Damaged wire or loose connection at battery terminals, coil, ECM connector or ignition control module connector.7.

Intermittent short circuit due to damaged wire insulation.8. Water or dirt in fuel system, carburetor or filter.9. Fuel tank vent system plugged or carburetor vent line closed off.10. Carburetor controls misadjusted.11. Air leak at intake manifold or air cleaner.12. Damaged carburetor.13.

Loose or dirty ECM connector or ignition control module connector.14. Faulty Sensor(s): Manifold Absolute Pressure (MAP) and/or Crank Position (CKP).15. Incorrect valve timing.16. Weak or broken valve springs.17.

Damaged intake or exhaust valve.A Spark Plug Fouls Repeatedly1. Fuel mixture too rich or enrichener left on too long.2. Incorrect spark plug for the kind of service.3. Piston rings badly worn or broken.4. Valve guides or seals badly worn. Pre-Ignition or Detonation (Knocks or Pings)1. Fuel octane rating too low.2.

Faulty spark plugs.3. Incorrect spark plug for the kind of service.4. Excessive carbon deposit on piston head or in combustion chamber.5. Ignition timing advanced due to faulty sensor inputs (MAP and/or CKP).Overheating1.

Insufficient oil supply or oil not circulating.2. Insufficient air flow over engine.3. Heavy carbon deposit.4. Ignition timing retarded due to faulty sensor(s): Manifold Absolute Pressure (MAP) and/or Crank Position (CKP).5. Leaking valve.Valve Train Noise1.

Low oil pressure caused by oil feed pump not functioning properly or oil passages obstructed.2. Faulty hydraulic lifters.3. Bent push rod.4. Incorrect push rod length.5.

Rocker arm binding on shaft.6. Valve sticking in guide.7. Chain tensioning spring or shoe worn.Excessive Vibration1.

Wheels and/or tires worn or damaged.2. Engine/transmission/rear wheel not aligned properly.3. Primary chain badly worn or links tight as a result of insufficient lubrication or misalignment.4. Engine to transmission mounting bolts loose.5. Upper engine mounting bracket loose.6.

Ignition timing advanced due to faulty sensor inputs (MAP and/or CKP)/poorly tuned engine.7. Internal engine problem.8.

Broken frame.Check Engine Light Illuminates During Operation1. Fault detected.Oil Does Not Return To Oil Pan1. Oil pan empty.2. Oil pump not functioning.3. Restricted oil lines or fittings.4.

Restricted oil filter.5. Oil pump misaligned or in poor condition.6. O-ring damaged or missing from oil pump/crankcase junction (also results in poor engine performance).Engine Uses Too Much Oil Or Smokes Excessively1. Oil pan overfilled.2. Restricted oil return line to pan.3. Restricted breather operation.4.

Restricted oil filter.5. Oil pump misaligned or in poor condition.6. Piston rings badly worn or broken.7. Valve guides or seals worn.8. O-ring damaged or missing from oil pump/crankcase junction (also results in poor engine performance).9. Plugged crankcase scavenge port.Engine Leaks Oil From Cases, Push Rods, Hoses, Etc.1.

Loose parts.2. Imperfect seal at gaskets, push rod cover, washers, etc.3. Restricted breather hose to air cleaner.4. Restricted oil filter.5. Oil pan overfilled.6. Lower rocker housing gasket installed incorrectly (upside down).7. Restricted oil return line to tank.Low Oil Pressure1.

Oil pan underfilled.2. Faulty low oil pressure switch.3.

Oil pump O-ring damaged or missing.4. Bypass valve stuck in open position.5. Ball or clean-out plug missing or leaking in cam support plate.6. O-ring missing from cam support plate.High Oil Pressure1. Oil pan overfilled.2. Bypass valve stuck in closed position.

1, 1, 1, 2 and 3. 1Department of Plant Pathology, EXIM Bank Agricultural University, Chapainawabganj, Bangladesh.

2Department of Biotechnology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh. 3Department of Plant Pathology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, BangladeshPlant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are the rhizosphere bacteria that may be utilized to augment plant growth and suppress plant diseases. The objectives of this study were to identify and characterize PGPR indigenous to cucumber rhizosphere in Bangladesh, and to evaluate their ability to suppress Phytophthora crown rot in cucumber.

A total of 66 isolates were isolated, out of which 10 (PPB1, PPB2, PPB3, PPB4, PPB5, PPB8, PPB9, PPB10, PPB11, and PPB12) were selected based on their in vitro plant growth promoting attributes and antagonism of phytopathogens. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA sequences identified these isolates as new strains of Pseudomonas stutzeri, Bacillus subtilis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. The selected isolates produced high levels (26.78–51.28 μg mL -1) of indole-3-acetic acid, while significant acetylene reduction activities (1.79–4.9 μmole C 2H 4 mg -1 protein h -1) were observed in eight isolates.

Cucumber plants grown from seeds that were treated with these PGPR strains displayed significantly higher levels of germination, seedling vigour, growth, and N content in root and shoot tissue compared to non-treated control plants. All selected isolates were able to successfully colonize the cucumber roots. Moreover, treating cucumber seeds with these isolates significantly suppressed Phytophthora crown rot caused by Phytophthora capsici, and characteristic morphological alterations in P. Capsici hyphae that grew toward PGPR colonies were observed.

Since these PGPR inoculants exhibited multiple traits beneficial to the host plants, they may be applied in the development of new, safe, and effective seed treatments as an alternative to chemical fungicides. IntroductionThe cucumber ( Cucumis sativus) is one of the most widely grown vegetable crops in the world, and is particularly prevalent on the Indian sub-continent.

This crop is prone to massive attacks by Phytophthora capsici that causes crown rot and blight (; ). Capsici infects susceptible hosts throughout the growing season at any growth stage, and causes yield losses as high as 100%. This pathogen has a wide host range with more than 50 plant species including Cucurbitaceae, Leguminosae, and Solanaceae. Although fungicides can control the disease, their use is detrimental to the surrounding environment and to the viability and survival of beneficial rhizosphere microbes (;; ). Furthermore, the growing cost of pesticides and the consumer demand for pesticide-free food have led to a search for substitutes for these products. Thus, there has been a need to find effective alternatives to costly and environmentally degrading synthetic pesticides.Rhizobacteria that benefit plants by stimulating growth and suppressing disease are referred to as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR; ). PGPR have been tested as biocontrol agents for suppression of plant diseases , and also as inducers of disease resistance in plants (;; ).

In particular, strains of Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, and Bacillus have been successfully used in attempts to control plant pathogens and increase plant growth (;;;;; ). The widely recognized mechanisms of plant growth promotion by PGPR are production of phytohormones, diazotrophic fixation of nitrogen, and solubilization of phosphate. Mechanisms of biocontrol action include competition with phytopathogens for an ecological niche or substrate, as well as production of inhibitory compounds and hydrolytic enzymes that are often active against a broad spectrum of phytopathogens (;;;;;; ).Many PGPR have been shown to reduce Phytophthora crown rot occurrence on various plants. Demonstrated in vitro suppression of P.

Capsici by bacterial isolates from the aerial part and rhizosphere of sweet pepper. An endophytic bacterium isolated from black pepper stem and roots, B. Megaterium IISRBP17 suppressed P. Capsici on black pepper in greenhouse assays.

Demonstrated that PGPR strains used separately or in combinations had the potential to suppress Phytophthora blight on squash in the greenhouse. Reported that some fluorescent pseudomonads isolated from different fields of East and West Azarbaijan and Ardebil provinces of Iran exhibited strong antifungal activity against P.

Free Download Bashan 200cc Service Manual Programs For Low Income Housing

Drechsleri and controlled crown and root rot of cucumber caused by the pathogen. However, little is known about PGPRs with the potential to suppress crown rot caused by P. Capsici on cucumber. Furthermore, the plant-growth-promoting and biocontrol efficacy of PGPR often depend upon the rhizosphere competence of the microbial inoculants. Rhizosphere competence refers to the survival and colonization potential of PGPR , and is thought to be highest for each PGPR strain when associated with its preferred host plant. This to some extent explains why some PGPR strains exhibiting promise as biocontrol agents in vitro have variable biocontrol efficacy in the rhizosphere of a given crop under a given set of conditions. The identification and characterization of PGPR populations indigenous to cucumber rhizospheres is therefore critical to discovery of strains that can be utilized to improve growth and Phytophthora crown rot suppression in cucumber.

The objectives of the present study were to isolate bacterial strains from the cucumber rhizosphere, to characterize these isolates on the basis of morphological and physiological attributes as well as by 16S rRNA sequence analysis, and to assess the plant growth promoting effects of these isolates in vivo and their ability to suppress Phytophthora crown rot in cucumber plants. To our knowledge, this is the first report of PGPR reducing P. Capsici infection on cucumber.

Materials and Methods The Study SiteThe experimental site was located at the Field Laboratory of the Department of Plant Pathology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Gazipur, Bangladesh. The location of the site is at 24.09° N latitude and 90.25° E longitude with an elevation of 2–8 m. The study area is within the Madhupur Tract agro-ecological zone (AEZ 28). The soil used for pot experiments belongs to the Salna series and has been classified as “swallow red brown terrace soil” in the Bangladesh soil classification system, which falls under the order Inceptisol. This soil is characterized by clay within 50 cm of the surface and is slightly acidic in nature. The pH value, cation exchange capacity (CEC) and electrical conductivity (EC) of bulk soil samples collected from the study site were 6.38, 6.78 meq 100 g -1 soil and 0.6 dS m -1, respectively.

This soil contained 1.08% organic carbon (OC), 1.87% organic matter (OM), 0.10% nitrogen (N), 9 ppm phosphorus (P) and 0.20 meq 100 g -1 soil exchangeable potassium (K). Plant Material, Bacterial Isolation, and Pathogenic OrganismCucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) variety Baromashi (Lal Teer Seed Company, Dhaka, Bangladesh) root samples were collected from the study site along with rhizosphere soil. For isolation of bacteria, 2–5 g of fresh roots were washed under running tap water and surface sterilized in 5% NaOCl for 1 min. After washing three times with sterilized distilled water (SDW), the root samples were ground with a sterilized mortar and pestle. Serial dilutions were prepared from the ground roots, and 100 μl aliquots from each dilution of 1 × 10 -6, 1 × 10 -7, and 1 × 10 -8 CFU mL -1 were spread on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates and incubated for 2 days at 28 ± 2°C. Morphologically distinct bacterial colonies were selected for further purifications.

The purified isolates were preserved temporarily in 20% glycerol solution at -20°C. The pathogen P. Capsici was provided by Prof.

Yuanchao, Nanjing Agricultural University, China. Morphological and Biochemical Characterization of Bacterial IsolatesColony morphology, size, shape, color, and growth pattern were recorded after 24 h of growth on PDA plates at 28 ± 2°C as described. Cell size was observed by light microscopy. The Gram reaction was performed as described. A series of biochemical tests were conducted to characterize the isolated bacteria using the criteria of Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. For the KOH solubility test, bacteria were aseptically removed from Petri plates with an inoculating wire loop, mixed with 3% KOH solution on a clean slide for 1 min and observed for formation of a thread-like mass.

The motility of each isolate was tested in sulfide indole motility (SIM) medium. Using a needle, strains were introduced into test tubes containing SIM, and were incubated at room temperature until the growth was evident.

Turbidity away from the line of inoculation was a positive indicator of motility. Catalase and oxidase tests were performed as described in and, respectively. To determine whether the rhizobacterial isolates are better suited to aerobic or anaerobic environments, the citrate test was conducted according to using Simmons citrate agar medium. All experiments were done following complete randomized design (CRD) with three replications for each isolate and repeated once.

Molecular Characterization of Bacterial IsolatesCulture DNA was obtained using the lysozyme-SDS-phenol/chloroform method. DNA was extracted with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and precipitated with isopropanol. The extracted DNA was treated with DNase-free RNase (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) at a final concentration of 0.2 mg/ml at 37°C for 15 min, followed by a second phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction and isopropanol precipitation. Finally, the DNA pellet was re-suspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), stored at -20°C, and used as template DNA in PCR to amplify the 16S rRNA for phylogenetic analysis.16S rRNA gene amplification was performed by using the bacterial-specific primers, 27F (5 ′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3 ′) and 1492R (5 ′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3 ′). PCR amplifications were performed with 1 × Ex Taq buffer (Takara Bio Inc, Japan), 0.8 mM dNTP, 0.02 units μl -1 Ex Taq polymerase, 0.4 mg ml -1 BSA, and 1.0 μM of each primer.

Three independent PCR amplifications were performed at an annealing temperature of 55°C (40 s), an initial denaturation temperature of 94°C (5 min), 30 amplification cycles with denaturation at 94°C (60 s), annealing (30 s), and extension at 72°C (60 s), followed by a final extension at 72°C (10 min). The PCR product was purified using Wizard ® PCR Preps DNA Purification System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Purified double-stranded PCR fragments were directly sequenced with Big Dye Terminator Cycle sequencing kits (Applied Biosystems, Forster City, CA, USA) using the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequences for each region were edited using Chromas Lite 2.0. The 16S rRNA sequence of the isolate has been deposited in the GenBank database.

The BLAST search program was used to search for nucleotide sequence homology for the 16S region for bacteria. Highly homologous sequences were aligned, and neighbor-joining trees were generated using ClustalX version 2.0.11 and MEGA version 6.06. Bootstrap replication (1000 replications) was used as a statistical support for the nodes in the phylogenetic trees. Bioassays for Plant Growth Promoting Traits Biological Nitrogen FixationNitrogenase activity of isolates was determined via the acetylene reduction assay/ethylene production assay as described in.

Pure bacterial colonies were inoculated to an airtight 30 ml vial containing 10 ml nitrogen-free basal semi-solid medium, and were grown for 48 h at 28 ± 2°C. Following pellicle formation, the bottles were injected with 10% (v/v) acetylene gas and incubated at 28 ± 2°C for 24 h. Ethylene production was measured using a G-300 Gas Chromatograph (Model HP 6890, USA) fitted with a Flame Ionization Detector and a Porapak-N column. Hydrogen and oxygen were used as a carrier gas, with a flow rate of 4 kg/cm 2, and the column temperature was maintained at 165°C. The ethylene concentration calibration curve was plotted for each trial, and the viable cell numbers (cfu) of the isolate were determined. The rate of N 2 fixation was expressed as the quantity of ethylene accumulated (μmol C 2H 4 mg -1 protein h -1) based on the standard curve and peak-area percentage. Indole-3-Acetic Acid ProductionFor detection and quantification of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production by bacterial isolates, isolated colonies were inoculated into Jensen’s broth (Sucrose 20 g, K 2HPO 4 1 g L -1, MgSO 4 7H 2O 0.5 g L -1, NaCl 0.5 g L -1, FeSO 4 0.1 g L -1, NaMoO 4 0.005 g L -1, CaCO 3 2 g L -1) containing 2 mg mL -1 L-tryptophan.

The culture was incubated at 28 ± 2°C with continuous shaking at 125 rpm for 48 h. Approximately 2 mL of culture solution was centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 1 min, and a 1 mL aliquot of the supernatant was mixed with 2 mL of Salkowski’s reagent and incubated 20 min in darkness at room temperature (150 ml concentrated H 2SO 4, 250 ml distilled water, 7.5 ml 0.5 M FeCl 3.6H 2O) as described. IAA production was observed as the development of a pink-red color, and the absorbance was measured at 530 nm using a spectrophotometer. The concentration of IAA was determined using a standard curve prepared from pure IAA solutions (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, and 65 μg ml -1). Preparation of Bacterial Inocula for Cucumber Seed TreatmentBacterial strains were cultured in 250 ml conical flasks containing 200 ml yeast peptone broth on an orbital shaker at 120 rpm for 72 h at 28 ± 2°C.

Bacterial cells were collected via centrifugation at 15000 rpm for 1 min at 4°C, and each pellet was washed twice with SDW. The bacterial pellets were suspended in 0.6 ml SDW, vortexed and used for seed treatment. Approximately 30–31 cucumber seeds were surface sterilized in 5% NaOCl for 1 min and washed three times in SDW. Dry seeds were immersed in each bacterial suspension, and the preparation was stirred frequently for 5 min. The treated seeds were spread on a petri dish and air dried overnight at room temperature. The number of bacterial cells per seed, determined via serial dilutions, was approximately 10 8 CFU/seed. Effect of Bacterial Seed Treatment on Germination and Vigour Index in CucumberIn order to determine the effect of the isolates on germination and seedling vigour, 100 seeds inoculated with each isolate were incubated in ten 9-cm petri dishes on two layers of moistened filter paper.

Free Download Bashan 200cc Service Manual Programs For Low Income Homeowners

As a control treatment, seeds treated with water instead of bacterial suspensions were also established. In order to maintain sufficient moisture for germination, 5 ml distilled water was added to the petri dishes every other day, and seeds were incubated at 28 ± 2°C in a light incubator. Germination was considered to have occurred when the radicles were half of the seed length.

The germination percentage was recorded every 24 h for 7 days. Root and shoot length were measured after the seventh day. The experiment was planned as a completely randomized design with 10 replications for each isolate. V i g o u r ⁢ i n d e x =% g e r min a t i o n × t o t a l ⁢ p l a n t ⁢ l e n g t h Effect of Bacterial Seed Treatment on Growth and Nitrogen Content in Cucumber PlantsIn order to test the ability of isolates to promote growth in cucumber plants, surface-sterilized cucumber seeds were inoculated with each isolate as described above.

The soil from the study site described above was used as potting medium. After autoclaving twice at 24 h intervals at 121°C and 15 psi for 20 min, 180 g of the sterilized soil was placed in each sterilized plastic pot (9.5 cm × 7.0 cm size).

One pre-germinated cucumber seed was sown in each pot, and plants were grown 3 weeks in a net house with watering on alternate days. After harvest, the fresh weight, dry weight, and root and shoot lengths of the plants were measured. The shoots and roots were separated and dried in an oven at 68 ± 2°C for 48 h, then ground for determination of tissue-N concentrations. Root ColonizationRoot colonization by bacterial isolates was determined according to the protocol of. Roots were harvested from plants at 7, 14, and 21 days of growth.

Root systems were thoroughly washed with running tap water to remove adhering soil particles, then were rinsed three times with SDW and blotted to dryness. Roots were divided into top, middle, and bottom regions, and were weighed and homogenized in SDW. Serial dilutions were prepared on PDA plates, and the number of colony-forming units (cfu) per gram root was determined after 24 h of incubation at 28 ± 2°C. Pathogenicity of P. Capsici in CucumberFor preparation of zoospore inoculum, P. Capsici was cultured on PDA plates at 18 ± 2°C for 7 days. Five-mm blocks were then cut from the culture plates and placed in petri dishes containing SDW.

The petridishes were incubated in darkness at room temperature for 72 h, followed by a 1-h cold treatment at 4°C. Zoospore production was confirmed via light microscopy. In order to test the pathogenicity of P. Capsici zoospores, cucumber seedlings were planted in pots containing 0, 500, 1000, or 1500 μl zoospores/pot. As 100% mortality was found in case 1000 μl zoospores/pot, two concentrations (500 and 1000 μl) of zoospores suspension per pot were fixed.

In Vitro Screening for AntagonismTo test antagonism of P. Capsici by each isolate, the pathogen and bacteria were inoculated 3 cm apart on the same agar plate. Fungal growth on each plate was observed, and the zone of inhibition, if present, was determined as described in. % I n h i b i t i o n ⁢ o f ⁢ m y ⁢ m y c e l i a l ⁢ g r o w t h = X − Y X × 100Where,X = Mycelial growth of pathogen in absence of antagonistsY = Mycelial growth of pathogen in presence of antagonistsMorphologies of hyphae in the vicinity of bacterial colonies were observed under a light microscope (Meiji Techno: ML2600), and images were recorded with a digital camera (Model: Canon Digital IXUS 900 Ti).

Each experiment was carried out following CRD with three replications for each isolate and repeated once. Testing the Effect of Rhizobacterial Seed Treatment on Phytophthora Crown Rot of CucumberCucumber seeds inoculated with each isolate were sown and grown for 7 days in sterilized plastic pots as described above.

Free Download Bashan 200cc Service Manual Programs For Low Income People

Seven-day-old seedlings were inoculated with 500 or 1000 μl zoospore suspension/pot as described in. Inoculated plants were kept inside humid chambers for 48 h. Each experiment included 12 plants per treatment with three replications. Surviving plants were counted 7 days after inoculation. Percent disease incidences (PDI) were calculated using the following formula.

% p r o t e c t i o n = A − B A × 100%Where,A = PDI in non-inoculated control plantsB = PDI in PGPR-treated plants. Statistical AnalysisStatistical analyses were performed using SPSS (Version 17) and Microsoft Office Excel 2007. A completely randomized design was used for all experiments, with 3–12 replications for each treatment. The data presented are from representative experiments that were repeated at least twice with similar results. Treatments were compared via ANOVA using the least significant differences test (LSD) at 5% ( P ≤ 0.05) probability level.

Results Strain Isolation and Biochemical and Molecular CharacterizationWe obtained a total of 66 rhizobacterial strains from the interior of cucumber roots. Ten isolates – PPB1, PPB2, PPB3, PPB4, PPB5, PPB8, PPB9, PPB10, PPB11, and PPB12 – were selected based on their ability to produce IAA, fix N 2, and show in vitro antagonism against various pathogens in a preliminary screening. All isolates were rods producing fast-growing, round to irregular colonies with raised elevations and smooth surfaces. Reddish pigmentation was produced by PPB5, while no pigmentation was produced by other isolates (Supplementary Table S1). All 10 isolates were motile and reacted positively to the Gram staining, citrate, catalase and oxidase tests, but reacted negatively to the KOH solubility test (Table ). Phylogenetic trees constructed from 16S rRNA sequences showed that the selected isolates were mainly members of genus Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Stenotrophomonas (Supplementary Figure ).

The sequences of the isolates PPB2, PPB5, PPB8, PPB9, and PPB11 showed 99% similarity with Bacillus subtilis and were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers KJ690255, KM008605, KM008606, KM092525 and KM092527, respectively (Table ). Isolate PPB1 had 99% homology with Pseudomonas stutzeri and was submitted to GenBank under accession number KJ959616. Isolate PPB3 was identified as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with GenBank accession number KJ959617.

Isolates PPB4, PPB10, and PPB12 showed 99% sequence homology with B. Amyloliquefaciens and were submitted to GenBank under accession number KM008604, KM092526 and KM092528, respectively (Table ).

Characterization for Plant Growth Promoting TraitsThe plant growth promoting characteristics viz., IAA production and ARA were examined with the ten selected PGPR isolates. The results of the assays are presented in Table.

In the presence of tryptophan, the isolated bacteria produced IAA in concentrations between 26.78 μg mL -1 and 51.28 μg mL -1. The highest and lowest amounts of IAA were produced by strain PPB5 and PPB3, respectively (Table ). Nitrogenese activity, as determined by ARA, was not detected in PPB1 and PPB12 under the conditions tested. However, the ARA values ranged from 1.79 to 4.9 μmole C 2H 4/mg protein/h for remaining isolates. PPB2 showed the highest activity, while the lowest was recorded for PPB11 (Table ). The other isolates also reduced acetylene in significant amounts.

Collectively, these results suggest that the isolates possess a number of traits associated with plant growth promotion. Germination and Vigour Index Improvement in CucumberThe effect of rhizobacterial treatment upon seed germination and vigour index of cucumber varied with different isolates.

All treatments had a significant effect on the germination rate and vigour index compared to the control. The PGPR treatments increased the germination rate of cucumber seeds by 8.07–15.32% compared with the control, while the vigour index was increased by 98.62–148.05% (Figure ). In both germination rate and vigour index, the maximum increase was obtained with the PPB9 treatment. These results suggest that rhizobacterial treatment could improve the germination and vigour of cucumber seeds. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) treatments on seed germination, vigour and growth characteristics of cucumber seedlings grown in pots under axenic conditions. Error bars are SE from three replicates per same treatment.

Data are presented as% increase in germination, vigour index, shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, and root dry weight of PGPR-treated cucumber seedlings relative to non-treated control seedlings. The experiment was repeated twice.

Plant Growth Promotion in CucumberAll isolates significantly increased the growth of cucumber compared to non-inoculated controls. Treatment with isolate PPB12 produced the maximum shoot and root lengths of 18.23 and 20.47 cm, corresponding to increases of 66.02 and 65.63% above control treatments (Figure ). However, the maximum shoot and root weight enhancement was observed in PPB8-treated plants. Treatment with isolate PPB8 produced shoot fresh and dry weights of 5.29 and 0.60 g plant -1, which were 79.32 and 100.00% higher than those of control plants. Similarly, treatment with isolate PPB8 produced root fresh and dry weights of 3.03 and 0.32 g plant -1, corresponding to increase of 91.77 and 128.57% above control treatments.

N Concentration in Cucumber PlantsThe N content in plant roots and shoots significantly increased due to inoculation treatments with rhizobacterial isolates (Figure ). The shoot and root N content showed similar trends in response to different treatments; hence, the N content is reported as the total combined shoot and root N. The total N content in PGPR-treated plants ranged from 3.66 mg g -1 to 8.25 mg g -1 N compared with 2.57 mg g -1 N for non-inoculated control plants, a 42–221% increase in PGPR-treated plants over control plants (Figure ). The highest N content was recorded in plants grown under PPB2 followed by PPB8, PPB3, PPB9 and other treatments.

Root ColonizationThe ability to colonize the root system is essential for rhizobacteria to be effective plant growth promoters. The root colonization assays showed that all the tested isolates successfully colonized the roots of cucumber plants as tested after only 7 days of seedling growth. The inoculated populations were even higher on 21-day-old roots. Nevertheless, the root population densities varied widely among the isolates (Figure ). The largest root populations were observed for strain PPB2, followed by PPB5 and PPB9 (Figure ).

These results demonstrate specific interactions between cucumber plants and the rhizobacterial isolates. In vitro Antagonism of Phytophthora capsiciAll rhizobacterial isolates exhibited significant antagonistic activity against P.

Capcisi on PDA. The largest inhibition zone was observed with PPB9 (90.08%) followed by PPB8 (82.05%) (Table ). Distinct morphological alterations in P. Capcisi hyphae were also detected during dual cultures with the rhizobacterial isolates.

Hyphal features observed in the vicinity of bacterial colonies included irregular and excessive branching, abnormal swelling of hyphal diameters, unusually long and pointed hyphal tips, and vacuolization leading to hyphal lysis (Figure ). Suppression of Phytophthora Crown Rot in CucumberAll the selected PGPR strains showed consistent suppression of Phytophthora crown rot in the greenhouse experiments. Compared with the control, the average disease protection at 500 μl zoospore suspension ranged from 50 to 88.83% after treatment with rhizobacterial isolates, while protection at 1000 μl zoospore suspension ranged from 33.33 to 86.08% (Table ). At both inoculum rates, isolate PPB11 showed the highest disease reduction, and the lowest disease reduction was obtained with PPB5. DiscussionsPGPR colonizing the surface or inner part of roots play important beneficial roles that directly or indirectly influence plant growth and development (; ). In this study, 10 PGPR classified as Pseudomonas stutzeri (PPB1), B. Subtilis (PPB2, 5, 8, 9, and 11), S.

Maltophilia (PPB3), and B. Amyloliquefaciens (PPB4, 10, and 12) were isolated from the rhizosphere of cucumber plants. All the isolated PGPR were gram positive and motile rods, and tested positive for the ability to utilize citrate as a carbon source. Flagellar motility and citrate utilization are both thought to play a significant role in competitive root colonization and maintenance of bacteria in roots (; ). These strains also tested positive for oxidase and catalase activity. Standard microbiology references suggest that S.

Maltophilia is an oxidase-negative bacterium. Recent data, however, suggest that some S. Maltophilia are oxidase-positive , and this was also the case for isolate PPB3 in this study. Our catalase test results corroborate prior studies showing that B. Subtilis, Pseudomonas stutzeri, and B. Amyloliquefaciens are catalase-positive (; ).

Bacillus and Pseudomonas are the most frequently reported genera of PGPR (;; ). Similarly, most isolates in this study belong to genus Bacillus.Treatment of cucumber seeds with the selected isolates significantly improved seedling emergence and growth. Several different mechanisms have been suggested for similar observations using other PGPR strains: PGPR might indirectly enhance seed germination and vigour index by reducing the incidence of seed mycoflora, which can be detrimental to plant growth. Found that amylase activity during germination was increased in rice and legume after inoculation with PGPR. The amylase hydrolyzes the starch into metabolizable sugars, which provide the energy for growth of roots and shoots in germinating seedlings (; ). One of the most commonly reported mechanisms is the production of phytohormones such as IAA.

All the selected isolates in this study produced IAA. Similar studies have shown that IAA production is very common among PGPR (;; ). In fact, many isolates in this study produced higher IAA than previously reported strains (;; ). This is an important mechanism of plant growth promotion because IAA promotes root development and uptake of nutrients.

It has long been proposed that phytohormones act to coordinate demand and acquisition of nitrogen. Therefore, enhanced N-content found in inoculated plants could be due to increased N-uptake by the roots caused by hormonal effects on root morphology and activity. Nitrogen fixation may also play a role in plant growth promotion.

All the selected isolates in this study except PPB1 and PPB12 showed acetylene reduction activity, which is a widely accepted surrogate for nitrogenase activity and N 2-fixing potential. However, defensible proof of N 2-fixation needs the application of 15N as tracer of soil N or as 15N 2-gas and the demonstration of significantly changed N-isotope-labeling in the plant biomass. Transfer of N between diazotrophic N-fixing rhizobacteria and the roots of several crops has been demonstrated (;;; ). It is interesting to note that in this study all isolates, including the two that demonstrated no acetylene reduction activity, enhanced the N content of cucumber.

This suggests that while N 2 fixation may be an important mechanism of plant growth promotion, there may also be alternate mechanisms, like hormonal interactions and nutrient uptake or pathogen suppression, which might be more pronounced than the contribution of nitrogen fixation.Results from our study indicate that PGPR strains applied as a seed treatment significantly reduced disease severity of Phytophthora crown rot on cucumber plants. The fungal antagonists Pseudomonas stutzeri, B. Amyloliquifaciens, and S. Maltophilia were have been shown to be effective biocontrol agents in prior studies (;;;;; ).

Competitive root tip colonization by PGPR strains might play an important role in the efficient control of soil-borne diseases. The crucial colonization level that must be reached has been estimated at 10 5–10 6 cfu g -1 of root in the case of Pseudomonas sp., which protect plants from Gaeumannomyces tritici or Pythium sp. Most of our selected strains were efficient colonizers of roots, since CFU counts for tested strains were more than 10 7 cfu g -1 root. However, the former study examined the root colonization by introduced bacteria under natural field soil conditions, while our study did under axenic conditions.

In view of that, comparison between root colonization data obtained under these two conditions may not be accurate. Biological control of P. Capsici can also result from antibiosis by the bacteria (;;;;; ). All the selected isolates exhibited moderate to high antagonistic activity against P.

Capsici in vitro, and caused clear morphological distortions such as abnormal branching, curling, swelling and lysis of the hyphae at the interaction zone in dual cultures. Excessive branching and curling accompanied by marked ultrastructural alterations including invagination of the hyphal membrane, disintegration or necrosis of hyphal cell walls, accumulation of excessive lipid bodies, enlarged and electron-dense vacuoles, and degradation of cytoplasm were potentially due to bacterial production of antibiotics and lytic enzymes (; ). These antibiotics and lytic enzymes cause membrane damage and are particularly inhibitory to zoospores of Oomycete (; ). Induced systemic resistance is most likely another mechanism by which bacteria suppress P.

Capsici.In the present study, we have isolated 10 new strains of PGPR from indigenous cucumber plants. These strains possessed several plant growth promoting traits as well as antifungal activity, and were found to be efficient in controlling Phytophthora crown rot of cucumber seedlings. In vitro and in vivo evidence suggest that the selected isolates benefit cucumber plants via multiple modes of action including antibiosis against phytopathogens, competitive colonization, and plant growth promotion. This reveals the potential of these strains for biofertilizer applications and commercial use as biocontrol agents in the field. However, from the estimation of a PGPR-potential to a biofertilizer application, it requires a long way of greenhouse experiments with pot filled with different type of soils and finally, field experiments to find out the optimum formulations for the inoculums. Thus, the inoculants can perform close to its optimum potential. Future studies concerning commercialization and field applications of integrated stable bio-formulations as effective biocontrol strategies are in progress.

Author ContributionSI was involved in the planning and execution of the research work; collection, analysis and interpretation of the data; manuscript writing etc. Following the suggestions and directions of the Major Professor. AMA served as the Member of the Dissertation Committee of SI and was involved in the planning of the work and editing of the manuscript. AP was actively involved in the original research work, data collection, analysis as well as manuscript preparation. TI supplied the Phytophthora capsici inocula and oversaw the sequence work of the bacterial isolates and related description in the manuscript. MMH served as the Major Professor of SI and was involved in the research design and planning; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting as well as critical revision of the work for intellectual content.All authors approve the final version of the manuscript for publication and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Conflict of Interest StatementThe authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge the financial assistance from University Grant Commissions through Research Management Committee of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh. The authors also wish to thank Prof. Islam for his help obtain 16S rRNA sequences of the tested bacterial isolates. Supplementary MaterialThe Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:FIGURE S1 Phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationships among the isolates isolated from cucumber rhizosphere. The data of type strains of related species were from GenBank database. Keywords: PGPR, plant growth promotion, IAA production, biological nitrogen fixation, antagonism, Phytophthora capsici, disease suppressionCitation: Islam S, Akanda AM, Prova A, Islam MT and Hossain MM (2016) Isolation and Identification of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria from Cucumber Rhizosphere and Their Effect on Plant Growth Promotion and Disease Suppression. Doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01360Received: 16 August 2015; Accepted: 16 November 2015; Published: 02 February 2016.

Reviewed by:, University of Texas at Arlington, USA, Sun Yat-sen University, ChinaCopyright © 2016 Islam, Akanda, Prova, Islam and Hossain. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Correspondence: Md.